At the convergence of politics, economics, and environmentalism lies the issue of the Keystone XL oil pipeline. The State Department contends that the project will have little impact on climate change but ignores the fragmentation of wildlife, land, and communities that will result. The environmental impact assessment is causing fissures within the Democratic Party and the entire country as environmental activists, organized labor, and job hungry Republican senators struggle against the implications of building the pipeline.
Do we want dirtier oil, releasing 17% more carbon emissions, or several thousand jobs for Americans? There's a fine line that separates the socio-economic-environmental effects of the Keystone Pipeline.
The comments on this CNN article are particularly interesting.
All of us will be watching Obama in the next 90 days. Let's hope he makes the right decision.
Friday, January 31, 2014
Thursday, January 30, 2014
Gold mining in Indonesia
In AP Environmental Science, we keep track of current environmental news. Here's a snippet from our non-renewable resources unit - my reflection on a New York Times article on gold mining in Indonesia.
What do we want? Fancy gold jewelry or brain damage, kidney
malfunctioning, and dysfunctional neurological development for those that
provide the metals?
A recent investigation of Indonesia’s gold mining industry
shows us an alarming trend: one hundred grams of mercury are incorporated into
the purified gold amalgam during the processing stage.
Some environmental
activists believe that the mercury is not being legally imported, but smuggled
into Indonesia for small-scale miners, under the radar. It seems preposterous
that the miners would be willing to put themselves at risk but in the lower
income level regions of Indonesia’s mining industry, lack of education and high
gold prices are to blame. Miners burn the mercury after purifying the gold with
it, in turn releasing the heavy metal into the atmosphere and any liquid
excesses into nearby water bodies.
But the damage isn’t limited to wildlife. Children
in the area been found to have dysfunctional motor skills, while parents that
operate the gold purifying businesses have internal mercury levels as high has
25 parts per million, as opposed to the World Health Organization’s healthy
standard of one ppm. I believe that when environmental degradation and health
hazards coincide, it’s a sign that the manufacturing process and world of consumerism
must change.
Buyers’ demand for precious metals, prices, and purity often
obscure the adverse environmental and health impacts behind the curtain of air
conditioned showrooms and thief proof cases. Educational programs on both sides
of the spectrum – manufacturing and consuming – need to be implemented for healthier
mining.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)