In AP Environmental Science, we keep track of current environmental news. Here's a snippet from our non-renewable resources unit - my reflection on a New York Times article on gold mining in Indonesia.
What do we want? Fancy gold jewelry or brain damage, kidney
malfunctioning, and dysfunctional neurological development for those that
provide the metals?
A recent investigation of Indonesia’s gold mining industry
shows us an alarming trend: one hundred grams of mercury are incorporated into
the purified gold amalgam during the processing stage.
Some environmental
activists believe that the mercury is not being legally imported, but smuggled
into Indonesia for small-scale miners, under the radar. It seems preposterous
that the miners would be willing to put themselves at risk but in the lower
income level regions of Indonesia’s mining industry, lack of education and high
gold prices are to blame. Miners burn the mercury after purifying the gold with
it, in turn releasing the heavy metal into the atmosphere and any liquid
excesses into nearby water bodies.
But the damage isn’t limited to wildlife. Children
in the area been found to have dysfunctional motor skills, while parents that
operate the gold purifying businesses have internal mercury levels as high has
25 parts per million, as opposed to the World Health Organization’s healthy
standard of one ppm. I believe that when environmental degradation and health
hazards coincide, it’s a sign that the manufacturing process and world of consumerism
must change.
Buyers’ demand for precious metals, prices, and purity often
obscure the adverse environmental and health impacts behind the curtain of air
conditioned showrooms and thief proof cases. Educational programs on both sides
of the spectrum – manufacturing and consuming – need to be implemented for healthier
mining.
No comments:
Post a Comment